Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34832300›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Hydrogel, Electrospun and Composite Materials for Bone/Cartilage and Neural Tissue Engineering.

Beata Niemczyk-Soczynska, Angelika Zaszczyńska, Konrad Zabielski, Pawel Sajkiewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beata Niemczyk-SoczynskaInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research, Lab. Polymers & Biomaterials, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5b St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-1015
Angelika ZaszczyńskaInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research, Lab. Polymers & Biomaterials, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5b St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3571-1438
Konrad ZabielskiFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Woloska 141, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Pawel SajkiewiczInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research, Lab. Polymers & Biomaterials, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5b St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4092-9853

Funding

National Science Center 2018/29/N/ST8/00780Operational Programme Knowledge Education Development 2014-2020, co-financed by the European Social Fund. POWR.03.02.00-00-1028/17-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injuries of the bone/cartilage and central nervous system are still a serious socio-economic problem. They are an effect of diversified, difficult-to-access tissue structures as well as complex regeneration mechanisms. Currently, commercially available materials partially solve this problem, but they do not fulfill all of the bone/cartilage and neural tissue engineering requirements such as mechanical properties, biochemical cues or adequate biodegradation. There are still many things to do to provide complete restoration of injured tissues. Recent reports in bone/cartilage and neural tissue engineering give high hopes in designing scaffolds for complete tissue regeneration. This review thoroughly discusses the advantages and disadvantages of currently available commercial scaffolds and sheds new light on the designing of novel polymeric scaffolds composed of hydrogels, electrospun nanofibers, or hydrogels loaded with nano-additives.

Indexed as

compositeselectrospun nanofibershydrogelsinjectable materialsnanoparticlespolymersscaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34832300
PMCPMC8624846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.