Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34832136›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Evaluating the Three-Dimensional Printing Accuracy of Partial-Arch Models According to Outer Wall Thickness: An In Vitro Study.

Seung-Ho Shin, Jae-Sung Kwon, June-Sung Shim, Jong-Eun Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05958043 (Performance of CAD/CAM Milled and 3D-printed Full-arch Implant-supported Provisionals Restorations), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05958043 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Performance of CAD/CAM Milled and 3D-printed Full-arch Implant-supported Provisionals Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Complutense de MadridRan2022 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsEdentulous Jaw, Dental Prosthesis Complication, Dental Prosthesis FailureArms3D- printed Full-arch Implant-supported Provisionals Restorations, CAD/CAM-milled Full-arch Implant-supported Provisionals Restorations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 3D Printing for Dental Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seung-Ho ShinDepartment of Prosthodontics, Oral Research Science Center, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-3458
Jae-Sung KwonDepartment and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9803-7730
June-Sung ShimDepartment of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-0122
Jong-Eun KimDepartment of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7834-2524

Funding

The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) 10077361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The printing accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) dental models using photopolymer resin affects dental diagnostic procedures and prostheses. The accuracy of research into the outer wall thickness and printing direction data for partial-arch model printing has been insufficient. This study analyzed the effects of wall thickness and printing direction accuracy. Anterior and posterior partial-arch models were designed with different outer wall thicknesses. After 3D printing, a trueness analysis was performed. Those with full-arch models were the control group. The full-arch model had an error value of 73.60 ± 2.61 µm (mean ± standard deviation). The error values for the partial-arch models with 1-, 2-, and 3-mm thick outer walls were 54.80 ± 5.34, 47.58 ± 7.59, and 42.25 ± 9.19 μm, respectively, and that for the fully filled model was 38.20 ± 4.63 μm. The printing accuracies differed significantly between 0 degrees and 60 degrees, at 49.54 ± 8.16 and 40.66 ± 6.80 μm, respectively (F = 153.121,

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufactureCAD/CAMhollow modelinternal structuretrueness

Identifiers

PMID34832136
PMCPMC8625861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.