Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831980›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Relationship between the Restorative Perception of the Environment and the Physiological and Psychological Effects of Different Types of Forests on University Students.

Qiaohui Liu, Xiaoping Wang, Jinglan Liu, Guolin Zhang, Congying An, Yuqi Liu, Xiaoli Fan, Yishen Hu, Heng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Restorative Effects from Green Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Greenspaces And Cardiovascular Health.Circulation research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qiaohui LiuCollege of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6131-3989
Xiaoping WangCollege of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Jinglan LiuSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Guolin ZhangManagement and Protection Center, Xiaolongshan National Nature Conservation, Tianshui 741020, China.
Congying AnSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9050-2634
Yuqi LiuSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-6966
Xiaoli FanSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4912-017X
Yishen HuSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Heng ZhangMing Dynasty Tombs Forest Farm, Beijing 102200, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term exposure to a forest environment is beneficial to human physiological and psychological health. However, there is little known about the relationship between the restorative perception of environment and physiological and psychological restoration achieved by experiencing the forest environment. This study evaluated the relationship between the restorative perception of different types of forests and human physiological and psychological effects. A sample of 30 young adult students from Beijing Forestry University was exposed to coniferous, deciduous, and mixed forests as well as an urban site. Restorative perception of the environment was measured using the PRS questionnaire. Restorative effects were measured using physiological indicators (blood pressure and heart rate) and three psychological questionnaires (Restorative Outcome Scale; Subjective Vitality Scale; Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale). The results demonstrated the following: (1) There were significant differences in the perceived restorative power of the three types of forests, with the highest level in the mixed forest, followed by the coniferous forest and the deciduous forest. (2) All types of forests were beneficial to physiological and psychological restoration. The mixed forest had the greatest effect in lowering blood pressure and heart rate as well as increasing vitality, while the coniferous forest had the strongest increases in psychological restoration and positive mental health. (3) The level of perceived restorative power of environment was positively related to the physiological and psychological restoration. These findings provide practical evidence for forest therapy that can maximize the restorative potential of forests.

Indexed as

ForestsUniversitiesForestryHumansPerceptionStudentsYoung Adultforest therapyforest typeshuman well-beingphysiological restorationpsychological impactrestorative environment

Identifiers

PMID34831980
PMCPMC8620764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.