Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831783›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: The Roles of Government and Civil Society in Fulfilling the Social Contract.

Daniel Mont, Natasha Layton, Louise Puli, Shivani Gupta, Abner Manlapaz, Kylie Shae, Emma Tebbutt, Irene Calvo, Mahpekay Sidiqy, Kudakwashe Dube and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Access to Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Voices of Users and Families.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Assistive Technology Provider Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel MontCenter for Inclusive Policy, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Natasha LaytonRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-8069
Louise PuliAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-0088
Shivani GuptaCenter for Inclusive Policy, Washington, DC 20005, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3300-6850
Abner ManlapazCenter for Inclusive Policy, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Kylie ShaeAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Emma TebbuttAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Irene CalvoAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Mahpekay SidiqyKabul Orthopaedic Organization, Kabul 1001, Afghanistan.
Kudakwashe DubeAfrica Disability Alliance, Pretoria 0077, South Africa.
Ulamila KacilalaPacific Disability Forum, GPO, Suva Box 18458, Fiji.
World Health Organization · CHMonash University · AUUniversity of the South Pacific · FJ

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed significant challenges to users of assistive technology (AT). Three key issues emerged from a series of structured qualitative interviews with 35 AT users in six low- and middle-income countries. These were (1) access to information about COVID-19 and available supports and policies, (2) insufficiency of the government response to meet the needs of AT users, and (3) the response of civil society which partially offset the gap in government response. AT users noted the need for better communication, improved planning for the delivery and maintenance of AT during times of crisis, and higher-quality standards to ensure the availability of appropriate technology.

Indexed as

COVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesSelf-Help DevicesGovernmentHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2assistive productsassistive technologyCOVID-19disabilityhealth systemspolicyservice provision

Identifiers

PMID34831783
PMCPMC8625172
OpenAlexW3214068954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.