Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831729›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Effects of Household Air Pollution (HAP) on Lung Function in Children: A Systematic Review.

Sathya Swarup Aithal, Shireen Gill, Imran Satia, Sudhir Kumar Tyagi, Charlotte E Bolton, Om P Kurmi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Indoor air pollution and airway health.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sathya Swarup AithalThe Global Health Office, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Shireen GillThe Global Health Office, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Imran SatiaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respirology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Sudhir Kumar TyagiDepartment of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi 110016, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3103-7100
Charlotte E BoltonNIHR Nottingham BRC Respiratory Theme, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Om P KurmiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respirology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9518-4716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that around 3 billion people today are exposed to smoke from the household combustion of solid fuels. While the household use of solid fuels has decreased over the last few decades, it remains a leading modifiable risk factor for the global burden of disease. This systematic review analyzed the impact of Household Air Pollution (HAP) on lung function in children (under 18 years of age), as this is the time period of accelerated growth rate until full skeletal maturity. Data from 11 published studies demonstrated that exposure to smoke from solid fuel was associated with a lower growth rate of several lung function indices (FVC, FEV

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorAdolescentAir PollutionChildCookingHumansLungSmokeSmokehousehold air pollutionindoor pollutionlung functionsolid fuels

Identifiers

PMID34831729
PMCPMC8623006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.