Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831648›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments.

Davina Mann, Janelle Kwon, Shaan Naughton, Sinead Boylan, Jasmine Chan, Karen Charlton, Jane Dancey, Carolyn Dent, Amanda Grech, Victoria Hobbs and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Davina MannGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Janelle KwonGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Shaan NaughtonGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Sinead BoylanCharles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Jasmine ChanGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Karen CharltonSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-444X
Jane DanceyBuildings and Property Division, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Carolyn DentNutrition & Dietetics, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Amanda GrechCharles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Victoria HobbsGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Sophie LamondMelbourne Law School, Melbourne School of Government, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3527-0794
Sandra MurraySchool of Health Science, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2261-7840
Melissa YongDivision of Student Life, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
Gary SacksGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-1539
Deakin University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUFlinders University · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, there is increasing interest in monitoring actions to create healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food environments. Currently, there is a lack of detailed tools for monitoring and benchmarking university food environments. This study aimed to develop the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) tool and process to benchmark the healthiness, equity, and environmental sustainability of food environments in tertiary education settings, and pilot test its implementation in three Australian universities in 2021. The Uni-Food tool development was informed by a review of the literature and input from an expert advisory panel. It comprises three components: (1) university systems and governance, (2) campus facilities and environments, and (3) food retail outlets. The process for implementing the tool is designed for universities to self-assess the extent to which they have implemented recommended practice in 68 indicators, across 16 domains, weighted based on their relative importance. The pilot implementation of the tool identified moderate diversity in food environments across universities and highlighted several opportunities for improvements at each institution. The assessment process was found to be reliable, with assessors rating the tool as easy to use, requiring minimal resources. Broad application of the tool has the potential to increase accountability and guide best practice in tertiary education and other complex institutional settings.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingUniversitiesAustraliaFoodFood SupplyHumansassessmentenvironmental sustainabilityequityfood environmentstooluniversity

Identifiers

PMID34831648
PMCPMC8625487
OpenAlexW3212521958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.