Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831555›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

eHealth Literacy: From Theory to Clinical Application for Digital Health Improvement. Results from the ACCESS Training Experience.

Roberta Bevilacqua, Stefano Strano, Mirko Di Rosa, Cinzia Giammarchi, Katerina Katka Cerna, Claudia Mueller, Elvira Maranesi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta BevilacquaScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, 60124 Ancona, Italy.
Stefano StranoScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, 60124 Ancona, Italy.
Mirko Di RosaUnit of Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology, IRCCS INRCA, 60127 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-4159
Cinzia GiammarchiScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, 60124 Ancona, Italy.
Katerina Katka CernaInformation Systems/IT for the Ageing Society, University of Siegen, 57076 Siegen, Germany.
Claudia MuellerInformation Systems/IT for the Ageing Society, University of Siegen, 57076 Siegen, Germany.
Elvira MaranesiScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, 60124 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2414-3773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skills, knowledge, and awareness of digital and technological tools are essential to improve the state of well-being and health of older adults and also to mitigate the condition of social isolation in the aging process. For this reason, it is necessary to implement a social learning of electronic/digital tools for health of older people to support the achievement of eHealth and digital competences. The paper reports the results of an Italian innovative eHealth training for the European project ACCESS. The training has been based on blended didactical and interactive educational techniques, aimed at collecting as many points of view as possible from older adults. A total of 58 older adults were recruited to attend a four-week training program, which included five modules. The results showed a statistical significant difference between the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) mean value before and after the course. A significant negative correlation was found between eHEALS and positive/total Survey of Technology Use (SOTU), suggesting an inverse relationship between positive/total SOTU and eHEALS. There is a strong positive and statistically significant relationship between satisfaction with the training and eHEALS. The results indicate that the intervention increased the digital competences of participants connected to health.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyTelemedicineAgedHumansInternetPersonal SatisfactionReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesdigital inclusioneHealth literacylifelong learningolder adultstraining

Identifiers

PMID34831555
PMCPMC8618977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.