Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831513›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Looking for Razors and Needles in a Haystack: Multifaceted Analysis of Suicidal Declarations on Social Media-A Pragmalinguistic Approach.

Michal Ptaszynski, Monika Zasko-Zielinska, Michal Marcinczuk, Gniewosz Leliwa, Marcin Fortuna, Kamil Soliwoda, Ida Dziublewska, Olimpia Hubert, Pawel Skrzek, Jan Piesiewicz and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Suicide Possibility Scale Detection via Sina Weibo Analytics: Preliminary Results.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michal PtaszynskiDepartment of Computer Science, Kitami Institute of Technology, Kitami 090-8507, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-9183
Monika Zasko-ZielinskaDepartment of Contemporary Polish Language, Faculty of Philology, University of Wrocław, 50-140 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6333-660X
Michal MarcinczukSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3269-6378
Gniewosz LeliwaSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Marcin FortunaSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5394-8127
Kamil SoliwodaSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Ida DziublewskaSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Olimpia HubertSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Pawel SkrzekSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Jan PiesiewiczSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Paula KarbowskaSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Maria DowgialloSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Juuso EronenDepartment of Computer Science, Kitami Institute of Technology, Kitami 090-8507, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-3652
Patrycja TempskaSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Maciej BrochockiSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4466-9147
Marek GodnySamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Michal WroczynskiSamurai Labs, 81-824 Sopot, Poland.
Kitami Institute of Technology · JPUniversity of Gdańsk · PLUniversity of Wrocław · PLUniwersytet SWPS · PLWrocław University of Science and Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we study language used by suicidal users on Reddit social media platform. To do that, we firstly collect a large-scale dataset of Reddit posts and annotate it with highly trained and expert annotators under a rigorous annotation scheme. Next, we perform a multifaceted analysis of the dataset, including: (1) the analysis of user activity before and after posting a suicidal message, and (2) a pragmalinguistic study on the vocabulary used by suicidal users. In the second part of the analysis, we apply LIWC, a dictionary-based toolset widely used in psychology and linguistic research, which provides a wide range of linguistic category annotations on text. However, since raw LIWC scores are not sufficiently reliable, or informative, we propose a procedure to decrease the possibility of unreliable and misleading LIWC scores leading to misleading conclusions by analyzing not each category separately, but in pairs with other categories. The analysis of the results supported the validity of the proposed approach by revealing a number of valuable information on the vocabulary used by suicidal users and helped to pin-point false predictors. For example, we were able to specify that death-related words, typically associated with suicidal posts in the majority of the literature, become false predictors, when they co-occur with apostrophes, even in high-risk subreddits. On the other hand, the category-pair based disambiguation helped to specify that death becomes a predictor only when co-occurring with future-focused language, informal language, discrepancy, or 1st person pronouns. The promising applicability of the approach was additionally analyzed for its limitations, where we found out that although LIWC is a useful and easily applicable tool, the lack of any contextual processing makes it unsuitable for application in psychological and linguistic studies. We conclude that disadvantages of LIWC can be easily overcome by creating a number of high-performance AI-based classifiers trained for annotation of similar categories as LIWC, which we plan to pursue in future work.

Indexed as

Social MediaSuicidal IdeationHumansLanguageLinguisticsLIWCsocial mediasuicidal declarations

Identifiers

PMID34831513
PMCPMC8624334
OpenAlexW3212302923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.