Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831424›Full record

ReviewCells2021

A Comprehensive Review on the Interplay between

Simon Peters, Ingo Fohmann, Thomas Rudel, Alexandra Schubert-Unkmeir

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exosome: an overview on enhanced biogenesis by small molecules.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  2. The Multifaceted Impact of Bioactive Lipids on Gut Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon PetersInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
Ingo FohmannInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
Thomas RudelChair of Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
Alexandra Schubert-UnkmeirInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant no SCHU2394/2-1, no SCHU2394/3-1; no RTG2581; no RU631/10-1, no RU631/13-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sphingolipids represent a class of structural related lipids involved in membrane biology and various cellular processes including cell growth, apoptosis, inflammation and migration. Over the past decade, sphingolipids have become the focus of intensive studies regarding their involvement in infectious diseases. Pathogens can manipulate the sphingolipid metabolism resulting in cell membrane reorganization and receptor recruitment to facilitate their entry. They may recruit specific host sphingolipid metabolites to establish a favorable niche for intracellular survival and proliferation. In contrast, some sphingolipid metabolites can also act as a first line defense against bacteria based on their antimicrobial activity. In this review, we will focus on the strategies employed by pathogenic

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsMetabolomeAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsHumansNeisseriaSphingolipidsAnti-Infective AgentsSphingolipidshost–pathogen interactionNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNeisseria meningitidissphingolipids

Identifiers

PMID34831424
PMCPMC8623382
OpenAlexW3213778224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.