Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831354›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Reciprocal Regulation of Hippo and WBP2 Signalling-Implications in Cancer Therapy.

Yvonne Xinyi Lim, Hexian Lin, Sock Hong Seah, Yoon Pin Lim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yvonne Xinyi LimIntegrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.
Hexian LinIntegrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.
Sock Hong SeahIntegrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5453-8672
Yoon Pin LimDepartment of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117596, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

National Medical Research Council NMRC/OFIRG/0034/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a global health problem. The delineation of molecular mechanisms pertinent to cancer initiation and development has spurred cancer therapy in the form of precision medicine. The Hippo signalling pathway is a tumour suppressor pathway implicated in a multitude of cancers. Elucidation of the Hippo pathway has revealed an increasing number of regulators that are implicated, some being potential therapeutic targets for cancer interventions. WW domain-binding protein 2 (WBP2) is an oncogenic transcriptional co-factor that interacts, amongst others, with two other transcriptional co-activators, YAP and TAZ, in the Hippo pathway. WBP2 was recently discovered to modulate the upstream Hippo signalling components by associating with LATS2 and WWC3. Exacerbating the complexity of the WBP2/Hippo network, WBP2 itself is reciprocally regulated by Hippo-mediated microRNA biogenesis, contributing to a positive feedback loop that further drives carcinogenesis. Here, we summarise the biological mechanisms of WBP2/Hippo reciprocal regulation and propose therapeutic strategies to overcome Hippo defects in cancers through targeting WBP2.

Indexed as

Hippo Signaling PathwayDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineTrans-ActivatorsTrans-Activatorscancerhippo pathwayoncogenereciprocal regulationtherapeuticsWW-domain binding protein 2

Identifiers

PMID34831354
PMCPMC8625973
OpenAlexW3212019354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.