Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831114›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Toxicological Analysis of Hepatocytes Using FLIM Technique: In Vitro versus Ex Vivo Models.

Svetlana Rodimova, Vadim Elagin, Maria Karabut, Irina Koryakina, Alexander Timin, Vladimir Zagainov, Mikhail Zyuzin, Elena Zagaynova, Daria Kuznetsova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Svetlana RodimovaInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Sq., 603000 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-2931
Vadim ElaginInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Sq., 603000 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2676-5661
Maria KarabutInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Sq., 603000 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Irina KoryakinaSchool of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova St., 191002 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander TiminResearch School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenin Ave., 634034 Tomsk, Russia.
Vladimir ZagainovInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Sq., 603000 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Mikhail ZyuzinSchool of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova St., 191002 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5364-2635
Elena ZagaynovaInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Sq., 603000 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Daria KuznetsovaInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Sq., 603000 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Privolzhsky Research Medical University · RUITMO University · RUNational Research Tomsk State University · RU

Funding

Grant of the President of the Russian Federation МК-1649.2021.3Russian Science Foundation 19-15-00263the State task of performing an experimental development of Privolzhsky Research Medical University Development of a test-system for determining individual drug sensitivity of patient tumors
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for new criteria indicating acute or chronic pathological processes resulting from exposure to toxic agents, testing of drugs for potential hepatotoxicity, and fundamental study of the mechanisms of hepatotoxicity at a molecular level still represents a challenging issue that requires the selection of adequate research models and tools. Microfluidic chips (MFCs) offer a promising in vitro model for express analysis and are easy to implement. However, to obtain comprehensive information, more complex models are needed. A fundamentally new label-free approach for studying liver pathology is fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). We obtained FLIM data on both the free and bound forms of NAD(P)H, which is associated with different metabolic pathways. In clinical cases, liver pathology resulting from overdoses is most often as a result of acetaminophen (APAP) or alcohol (ethanol). Therefore, we have studied and compared the metabolic state of hepatocytes in various experimental models of APAP and ethanol hepatotoxicity. We have determined the potential diagnostic criteria including the pathologically altered metabolism of the hepatocytes in the early stages of toxic damage, including pronounced changes in the contribution from the bound form of NAD(P)H. In contrast to the MFCs, the changes in the metabolic state of hepatocytes in the ex vivo models are, to a greater extent, associated with compensatory processes. Thus, MFCs in combination with FLIM can be applied as an effective tool set for the express modeling and diagnosis of hepatotoxicity in clinics.

Indexed as

Microscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalToxicity TestsAcetaminophenAnimalsCells, CulturedEthanolHepatocytesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular ImagingRatsAcetaminophenEthanolFLIMhepatocyteliver pathologymetabolismmicrofluidic chip

Identifiers

PMID34831114
PMCPMC8616382
OpenAlexW3211168683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.