Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831072›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Inhibitors of the

Melissa Louise Stofberg, Celine Caillet, Marianne de Villiers, Tawanda Zininga

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The possibilities and challenges associated with selective targetingTransactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Royal Society of South Africa · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. In-silico analysis of potent Mosquirix vaccine adjuvant leads.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa Louise StofbergDepartment of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1375-9326
Celine CailletDepartment of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6276-7325
Marianne de VilliersDepartment of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-3498
Tawanda ZiningaDepartment of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

National Research Foundation 129401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria is still one of the major killer parasitic diseases in tropical settings, posing a public health threat. The development of antimalarial drug resistance is reversing the gains made in attempts to control the disease. The parasite leads a complex life cycle that has adapted to outwit almost all known antimalarial drugs to date, including the first line of treatment, artesunate. There is a high unmet need to develop new strategies and identify novel therapeutics to reverse antimalarial drug resistance development. Among the strategies, here we focus and discuss the merits of the development of antimalarials targeting the Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) due to the central role it plays in protein quality control.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntimalarialsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansPlasmodium falciparumAntimalarialsHSP90 Heat-Shock Proteinsheat shock protein 90Hsp90 inhibitorsmalariamolecular chaperoneparasite Hsp90Plasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID34831072
PMCPMC8616389
OpenAlexW3209076842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.