Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830957›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Does Pancreatic Fistula Affect Long-Term Survival after Resection for Pancreatic Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Andrea Grego, Alberto Friziero, Simone Serafini, Amanda Belluzzi, Lucia Moletta, Luca Maria Saadeh, Cosimo Sperti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Surgical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pancreatic Fistula after Distal Pancreatectomy with Stapler.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea GregoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgery Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7217-3184
Alberto FrizieroDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgery Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Simone SerafiniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgery Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1465-8439
Amanda BelluzziDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgery Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Lucia MolettaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgery Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4041-5721
Luca Maria SaadehDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgery Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Cosimo SpertiDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgery Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7869-8715
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) on survival after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear.

methodsThe MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting on survival in patients with and without POPF. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the impact of POPF on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsSixteen retrospective cohort studies concerning a total of 5019 patients with an overall clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) rate of 12.63% (n = 634 patients) were considered. Five of eleven studies including DFS data reported higher recurrence rates in patients with POPF, and one study showed a higher recurrence rate in the peritoneal cavity. Six of sixteen studies reported worse OS rates in patients with POPF. Sufficient data for a meta-analysis were available in 11 studies for DFS, and in 16 studies for OS. The meta-analysis identified a shorter DFS in patients with CR-POPF (HR 1.59,

conclusionsCR-POPF after resection for PDAC is significantly associated with worse overall and disease-free survival.

Indexed as

overall survivalpancreatectomypancreatic adenocarcinomapancreatic cancerPOPFpostoperative pancreatic fistulasurvival

Identifiers

PMID34830957
PMCPMC8616191
OpenAlexW3211889935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.