Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830849›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Histological Subtypes with a Favourable Prognosis.

Gábor Cserni, Cecily M Quinn, Maria Pia Foschini, Simonetta Bianchi, Grace Callagy, Ewa Chmielik, Thomas Decker, Falko Fend, Anikó Kovács, Paul J van Diest and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Gábor CserniDepartment of Pathology, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1344-7744
Cecily M QuinnDepartment of Histopathology, BreastCheck, Irish National Breast Screening Programme & St. Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland.
Maria Pia FoschiniUnit of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Simonetta BianchiDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Pathological Anatomy, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2605-4758
Grace CallagyDiscipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Ewa ChmielikTumor Pathology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland.
Thomas DeckerDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Centre, 17036 Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Falko FendDepartment of Pathology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Anikó KovácsDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41 345 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0658-2745
Ian O EllisDepartment of Histopathology, University of Nottingham and The Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Emad RakhaDepartment of Histopathology, University of Nottingham and The Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Tibor TotPathology & Cytology Dalarna, Falun County Hospital, 791 82 Falun, Sweden.
European Working Group For Breast Screening Pathology
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBFalun Hospital · SEOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Szeged · HUUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), as a group of tumours, have a worse prognosis than stage-matched non-TNBC and lack the benefits of routinely available targeted therapy. However, TNBC is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which includes some special type carcinomas with a relatively indolent course. This review on behalf of the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology reviews the literature on the special histological types of BC that are reported to have a triple negative phenotype and indolent behaviour. These include adenoid cystic carcinoma of classical type, low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma, fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma, low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, secretory carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, and tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity. The pathological and known molecular features as well as clinical data including treatment and prognosis of these special TNBC subtypes are summarised and it is concluded that many patients with these rare TNBC pure subtypes are unlikely to benefit from systemic chemotherapy. A consensus statement of the working group relating to the multidisciplinary approach and treatment of these rare tumour types concludes the review.

Indexed as

acinic cell carcinomaadenoid cystic carcinomafibromatosis like metaplastic carcinomalow-grade adenosquamous carcinomamucoepidermoid carcinomasecretory carcinomatall cell carcinoma with reversed polaritytriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID34830849
PMCPMC8616217
OpenAlexW3212226002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.