Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830847›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Small but Challenging Conjunctival Melanoma: New Insights, Paradigms and Future Perspectives.

Sacha Nahon-Estève, Corine Bertolotto, Alexandra Picard-Gauci, Lauris Gastaud, Stéphanie Baillif, Paul Hofman, Anaïs Groulier, Célia Maschi, Jean-Pierre Caujolle, Sandra Lassalle and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sacha Nahon-EstèveOphthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2274-0256
Corine BertolottoDepartment of Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe Labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, INSERM, 06200 Nice, France.
Alexandra Picard-GauciDermatology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
Lauris GastaudAntoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Oncology Department, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
Stéphanie BaillifOphthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-8570
Paul HofmanFHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-9353
Anaïs GroulierAntoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
Célia MaschiOphthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9424-1539
Jean-Pierre CaujolleOphthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-4557
Sandra LassalleFHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.
Arnaud MartelOphthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3836-7126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although its incidence has increased over the last decades, conjunctival melanoma (CM) remains a rare but challenging periocular malignancy. While there is currently no recognized standard of care, "no-touch" surgical excision followed by adjuvant treatments is usually recommended. Despite its small size, managing CM is challenging for clinicians. The first challenge is the high risk of tumour local recurrence that occurs in about one third of the patients. The management of locally advanced CM (≥T2) or multiple recurrences may require mutilating surgeries such as orbital exenteration (OE). The second challenge is the metastatic spread of CM that occurs in about one quarter of patients, regardless of whether complete surgical excision is performed or not. This highlights the infiltrative and highly aggressive behaviour of CM. Recently, attention has been directed towards the use of eye-sparing strategies to avoid OE. Initially, wide conservative surgeries followed by customized brachytherapy or radiotherapy have appeared as viable strategies. Nowadays, new biological insights into CM have revealed similarities with cutaneous melanoma. These new findings have allowed clinicians to reconsider the management of locally advanced CM with "medical" eye-sparing treatment as well as the management of metastatic spread. The aim of this review was to summarize the current and future perspectives of treatment for CM based on recent biological findings.

Indexed as

conjunctival melanomaimmunotherapymetastasesorbital exenterationproton beam radiotherapytargeted therapiestumour recurrence

Identifiers

PMID34830847
PMCPMC8616295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.