Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830783›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Gastric Cancers Missed at Upper Endoscopy in Central Norway 2007 to 2016-A Population-Based Study.

Marianne Beck, Erling A Bringeland, Gunnar Qvigstad, Reidar Fossmark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marianne BeckDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Erling A BringelandDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Gunnar QvigstadDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Reidar FossmarkDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-9357
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rates of missed gastric cancers (MGC) at upper endoscopy (UE) has been reported at 5-10% in Western countries. We aimed to calculate the rate of MGC and identify factors associated with MGC.

methodsRetrospective population-based cohort study including 730 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma in Central Norway 2007-2016. MGCs were incident gastric adenocarcinomas diagnosed 6-36 months after a previous UE. Factors associated with MGC were examined. Definitely missed (UE 6-12 months prior) and potentially missed (UE 12-36 months prior) MGCs were compared.

resultsSixty-seven (9.2%) of 730 gastric cancers were MGC. MGC were associated with localization (

conclusionsMGC accounted for 9.2% of gastric cancers in Central Norway. MGC were associated with localization in the corpus, Lauren´s diffuse type and previous Billroth-2-operation. Intensified follow-up and adequate biopsy sampling of patients with gastric ulcerations could reduce the rate of missed gastric cancers.

Indexed as

gastric cancermissed cancerupper endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID34830783
PMCPMC8616093
OpenAlexW3211792490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.