Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830746›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Algorithms for Automated Calibration of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Facilitate Clinical Applications.

Christina Salchow-Hömmen, Thomas Schauer, Philipp Müller, Andrea A Kühn, Ursula S Hofstoetter, Nikolaus Wenger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina Salchow-HömmenDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-9895
Thomas SchauerControl Systems Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0865-4418
Philipp MüllerControl Systems Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Andrea A KühnDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4134-9060
Ursula S HofstoetterCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-6483
Nikolaus WengerDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0965-7530
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DETechnische Universität Berlin · DEMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (FWF) I 3837-B34BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program Nikolaus WengerGerman Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy ZF4171703TS7German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Fund of TU Berlin n/aVolkswagen Foundation, Freigeist-Fellow Nikolaus Wenger
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a promising intervention that can benefit spasticity control and augment voluntary movement in spinal cord injury (SCI) and multiple sclerosis. Current applications require expert knowledge and rely on the thorough visual analysis of electromyographic (EMG) responses from lower-limb muscles to optimize attainable treatment effects. Here, we devised an automated tSCS setup by combining an electrode array placed over low-thoracic to mid-lumbar vertebrae, synchronized EMG recordings, and a self-operating stimulation protocol to systematically test various stimulation sites and amplitudes. A built-in calibration procedure classifies the evoked responses as reflexes or direct motor responses and identifies stimulation thresholds as recommendations for tSCS therapy. We tested our setup in 15 individuals (five neurologically intact, five SCI, and five Parkinson's disease) and validated the results against blinded ratings from two clinical experts. Congruent results were obtained in 13 cases for electrode positions and in eight for tSCS amplitudes, with deviations of a maximum of one position and 5 to 10 mA in amplitude in the remaining cases. Despite these minor deviations, the calibration found clinically suitable tSCS settings in 13 individuals. In the remaining two cases, the automatic setup and both experts agreed that no reflex responses could be detected. The presented technological developments may facilitate the dissemination of tSCS into non-academic environments and broaden its use for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

automationelectromyographynoninvasiveParkinson’s diseaseposterior root-muscle reflexesspasticityspinal cord injuryspinal cord stimulationtranscutaneous

Identifiers

PMID34830746
PMCPMC8623351
OpenAlexW3217726704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.