Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830704›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Implications of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment Modality for Tinnitus.

Alexa J Denton, Ariel Finberg, Peter E Ashman, Nathalie B Bencie, Tricia Scaglione, Brianna Kuzbyt, Fred F Telischi, Rahul Mittal, Adrien A Eshraghi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexa J DentonUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Ariel FinbergUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Peter E AshmanUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Nathalie B BencieUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Tricia ScaglioneUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Brianna KuzbytUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Fred F TelischiUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Rahul MittalUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Adrien A EshraghiUniversity of Miami Ear Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, neuromodulating technique for brain hyperexcitability disorders. The objective of this paper is to discuss the mechanism of action of rTMS as well as to investigate the literature involving the application of rTMS in the treatment of tinnitus. The reviewed aspects of the protocols included baseline evaluation, the total number of sessions, frequency and the total number of stimuli, the location of treatment, and the outcome measures. Even with heterogeneous protocols, most studies utilized validated tinnitus questionnaires as baseline and outcome measures. Low frequency (1 Hz) stimulation throughout 10 consecutive sessions was the most widely used frequency and treatment duration; however, there was no consensus on the total number of stimuli necessary to achieve significant results. The auditory cortex (AC) was the most targeted location, with most studies supporting changes in neural activity with multi-site stimulation to areas in the frontal cortex (FC), particularly the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The overall efficacy across most of the reviewed trials reveals positive statistically significant results. Though rTMS has proven to impact neuroplasticity at the microscopic and clinical level, further studies are warranted to demonstrate and support the clinical use of rTMS in tinnitus treatment with a standardized protocol.

Indexed as

auditory cortexneuromodulationnon-invasivesynaptic plasticitytinnitusTMS

Identifiers

PMID34830704
PMCPMC8622674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.