Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830583›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks.

Gauthier Dot, Frédéric Rafflenbeul, Adeline Kerbrat, Philippe Rouch, Laurent Gajny, Thomas Schouman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of an Online Supervised Exercise Training in Children with Obesity during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gauthier DotInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Paristech, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-2623
Frédéric RafflenbeulDepartment of Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Adeline KerbratInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Paristech, 75013 Paris, France.
Philippe RouchInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Paristech, 75013 Paris, France.
Laurent GajnyInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Paristech, 75013 Paris, France.
Thomas SchoumanInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Paristech, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6392-7415
Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak · FREPF - École d'ingénieurs · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Fondation des gueules cassées 28-2020Société Française d'Orthopédie Dento-Faciale 2019 research prize
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In some dentofacial deformity patients, especially patients undergoing surgical orthodontic treatments, Computed Tomography (CT) scans are useful to assess complex asymmetry or to plan orthognathic surgery. This assessment would be made easier for orthodontists and surgeons with a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis, which would require the localization of landmarks and the construction of reference planes. The objectives of this study were to assess manual landmarking repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) of a set of 3D landmarks and to evaluate R&R of vertical cephalometric measurements using two Frankfort Horizontal (FH) planes as references for horizontal 3D imaging reorientation. Thirty-three landmarks, divided into "conventional", "foraminal" and "dental", were manually located twice by three experienced operators on 20 randomly-selected CT scans of orthognathic surgery patients. R&R confidence intervals (CI) of each landmark in the -x, -y and -z directions were computed according to the ISO 5725 standard. These landmarks were then used to construct 2 FH planes: a conventional FH plane (orbitale left, porion right and left) and a newly proposed FH plane (midinternal acoustic foramen, orbitale right and left). R&R of vertical cephalometric measurements were computed using these 2 FH planes as horizontal references for CT reorientation. Landmarks showing a 95% CI of repeatability and/or reproducibility > 2 mm were found exclusively in the "conventional" landmarks group. Vertical measurements showed excellent R&R (95% CI < 1 mm) with either FH plane as horizontal reference. However, the 2 FH planes were not found to be parallel (absolute angular difference of 2.41°, SD 1.27°). Overall, "dental" and "foraminal" landmarks were more reliable than the "conventional" landmarks. Despite the poor reliability of the landmarks orbitale and porion, the construction of the conventional FH plane provided a reliable horizontal reference for 3D craniofacial CT scan reorientation.

Indexed as

anatomic landmarkscephalometryorthodonticsorthognathic surgeryreproducibility of resultstomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID34830583
PMCPMC8624462
OpenAlexW3213646963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.