ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bony increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) vs metal augments: A systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Fatty change in rotator cuff muscles following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: does the humeral component design matter?Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Sandwich Reconstruction Technique for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Iliac Crest Autograft and Coracoid Transfer.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Augmented vs. standard glenoid baseplate use in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.JSES international · 2025Article
- Current concepts in patient specific implants for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2025Review
- [Digital remote monitoring of chronic retinal conditions-A clinical future tool? : Remote monitoring of chronic retinal conditions].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Bone Versus Metallic Augmented, Central Screw Type Baseplate in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Matched Case-Control Study.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2024Article
- Factors that affect external rotation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective multi-centre study on 501 shoulders.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Innovations in the Realm of Shoulder Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There are different techniques to address severe glenoid erosion during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA with combined bony and metallic augment (BMA) glenoid reconstruction compared to bony augmentation (BA) alone. A review of patients who underwent RSA with severe glenoid bone loss requiring reconstruction from January 2017 to January 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: BMA versus BA alone. Clinical outcome measurements included two years postoperative ROM, Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score. Radiological outcomes included radiographic evidence of scapular complications and graft incorporation. The BMA group had significantly different glenoid morphology (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.