Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830498›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

A Prospective Investigation of Predictive Parameters for Preoperative Volume Assessment in Breast Reconstruction.

Nicola Zingaretti, Giovanni Miotti, Carlo Alberto Maronese, Miriam Isola, Gianni Franco Guarneri, Roberta Albanese, Francesco De Francesco, Michele Riccio, Lorenzo Cereser, Chiara Zuiani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicola ZingarettiClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1575-0029
Giovanni MiottiClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Carlo Alberto MaroneseUOC Dermatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20162 Milano, Italy.
Miriam IsolaDivision of Medical Statistic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Gianni Franco GuarneriClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Roberta AlbaneseClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Francesco De FrancescoAccademia del Lipofilling, Research and Training Center in Regenerative Surgery, 61025 Montelabbate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2977-7828
Michele RiccioAccademia del Lipofilling, Research and Training Center in Regenerative Surgery, 61025 Montelabbate, Italy.
Lorenzo CereserInstitute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Chiara ZuianiInstitute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Pier Camillo ParodiClinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative breast volume estimation is very important for the success of the breast surgery. In this study four different breast volume determination methods were compared. The end-point of this prospective study was to evaluate the concordance between different modalities of breast volume assessment (MRI, BREAST-V, mastectomy specimen weight, conversion from weight to volume of mastectomy specimen) and the breast prosthetic volume implanted. The study enrolled 64 patients between 2017 and 2019, who had all been treated by the same surgeons for monolateral nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy and implant breast reconstruction. Only patients who had a breast reconstruction classified as "excellent" from an objective (BCCT.core software) and subjective (questionnaire) point of view at the 6-month interval after the operation were included in the study. Data analysis highlighted a strong correlation between the volumes of the chosen prostheses and the weights of mastectomy converted into volume, especially for patients with grades B and C parenchymal density. The values of the agreement between the volumes of the chosen prostheses and the assessments from MRI and BREAST -V proved to be lower than expected from the literature. None of the four studied methods presented any strong correlation with the initial breast width. Our results suggest that conversion from weight to volume of mastectomy specimen should be used to assist in determining the volume of the breast implant to be implanted. This method would help the reconstructive surgeon guide the choice of the most appropriate implant preoperatively.

Indexed as

breast imagingbreast implant reconstructionbreast implant sizebreast-Vconversion from weight to volume of mastectomy specimenMRIvolume estimation

Identifiers

PMID34830498
PMCPMC8617962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.