Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830497›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rui Gilberto Ferreira, Carolina Rodrigues Mendonça, Carolina Leão de Moraes, Fernanda Sardinha de Abreu Tacon, Lelia Luanne Gonçalves Ramos, Natalia Cruz E Melo, Lourenço Sbragia, Waldemar Naves do Amaral, Rodrigo Ruano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prenatal ultrasound markers for prediction of complex gastroschisis-single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui Gilberto FerreiraPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74650-050, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-8598
Carolina Rodrigues MendonçaPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74650-050, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-8227
Carolina Leão de MoraesPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74650-050, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0755-0753
Fernanda Sardinha de Abreu TaconPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74650-050, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0168-3918
Lelia Luanne Gonçalves RamosHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-020, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9945-3728
Natalia Cruz E MeloDepartamento de Ginecologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9981-7085
Lourenço SbragiaDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-6345
Waldemar Naves do AmaralPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74650-050, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0824-1138
Rodrigo RuanoDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center Houston (UTHealth), Houston 77030, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3642-5858
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although gastroschisis is often diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, there is still a gap in the literature about which prenatal ultrasound markers can predict complex gastroschisis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the ultrasound markers that characterize complex gastroschisis. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA. The protocol was registered (PROSPERO ID CRD42020211685). Meta-analysis was displayed graphically on Forest plots, which estimate prevalence rates and risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals, using STATA version 15.0. The combined prevalence of intestinal complications in fetuses with complex gastroschisis was 27.0%, with a higher prevalence of atresia (about 48%), followed by necrosis (about 25%). The prevalence of deaths in newborns with complex gastroschisis was 15.0%. The predictive ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis were intraabdominal bowel dilatation (IABD) (RR 3.01, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.07; I

Indexed as

congenital anomaliesfetal interventionfetal surgerygastroschisisprenatal diagnosisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34830497
PMCPMC8619043
OpenAlexW3212975787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.