Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830302›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

3D Printed Multiphasic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Repair: Challenges and Opportunities.

Stephanie E Doyle, Finn Snow, Serena Duchi, Cathal D O'Connell, Carmine Onofrillo, Claudia Di Bella, Elena Pirogova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review 3D-Printed hydrogels for tissue engineering: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Advancements in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie E DoyleElectrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5776-0962
Finn SnowElectrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Serena DuchiACMD, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.
Cathal D O'ConnellElectrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Carmine OnofrilloACMD, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-6419
Claudia Di BellaACMD, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9980-8672
Elena PirogovaElectrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9422-1370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteochondral (OC) defects are debilitating joint injuries characterized by the loss of full thickness articular cartilage along with the underlying calcified cartilage through to the subchondral bone. While current surgical treatments can provide some relief from pain, none can fully repair all the components of the OC unit and restore its native function. Engineering OC tissue is challenging due to the presence of the three distinct tissue regions. Recent advances in additive manufacturing provide unprecedented control over the internal microstructure of bioscaffolds, the patterning of growth factors and the encapsulation of potentially regenerative cells. These developments are ushering in a new paradigm of 'multiphasic' scaffold designs in which the optimal micro-environment for each tissue region is individually crafted. Although the adoption of these techniques provides new opportunities in OC research, it also introduces challenges, such as creating tissue interfaces, integrating multiple fabrication techniques and co-culturing different cells within the same construct. This review captures the considerations and capabilities in developing 3D printed OC scaffolds, including materials, fabrication techniques, mechanical function, biological components and design.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAbsorbable ImplantsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTissue TransplantationBiocompatible Materials3D printingarticular cartilagebiofabricationcalcified cartilagemultiphasicosteochondralsubchondral bone

Identifiers

PMID34830302
PMCPMC8622524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.