ReviewBiomedicines2021
Deep Learning for Human Disease Detection, Subtype Classification, and Treatment Response Prediction Using Epigenomic Data.
Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing complexity and clarity-towards clinician-ready antibiotic resistance prediction models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology.MedComm · 2025Review
- Subtypes detection of papillary thyroid cancer from methylation assay via Deep Neural Network.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Advancing precision oncology with AI-powered genomic analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- P.O.L.A.R. Star: A New Framework Developed and Applied by One Mid-Sized Pharmaceutical Company to Drive Digital Transformation in R&D.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Article
- A Novel Image Processing Method for Obtaining an Accurate Three-Dimensional Profile of Red Blood Cells in Digital Holographic Microscopy.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Machine learning diagnosis by immunoglobulin N-glycan signatures for precision diagnosis of urological diseases.Cancer science · 2022Article
- Prediction of Gastric Cancer-Related Genes Based on the Graph Transformer Network.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) is a distinct class of machine learning that has achieved first-class performance in many fields of study. For epigenomics, the application of DL to assist physicians and scientists in human disease-relevant prediction tasks has been relatively unexplored until very recently. In this article, we critically review published studies that employed DL models to predict disease detection, subtype classification, and treatment responses, using epigenomic data. A comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and arXiv.org was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Among 1140 initially identified publications, we included 22 articles in our review. DNA methylation and RNA-sequencing data are most frequently used to train the predictive models. The reviewed models achieved a high accuracy ranged from 88.3% to 100.0% for disease detection tasks, from 69.5% to 97.8% for subtype classification tasks, and from 80.0% to 93.0% for treatment response prediction tasks. We generated a workflow to develop a predictive model that encompasses all steps from first defining human disease-related tasks to finally evaluating model performance. DL holds promise for transforming epigenomic big data into valuable knowledge that will enhance the development of translational epigenomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.