Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34829532›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Method Validation and Characterization of the Associated Uncertainty for Malondialdehyde Quantification in Exhaled Breath Condensate.

Maud Hemmendinger, Jean-Jacques Sauvain, Nancy B Hopf, Pascal Wild, Guillaume Suárez, Irina Guseva Canu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Acute and Chronic Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maud HemmendingerCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Lausanne, 1066 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3702-1054
Jean-Jacques SauvainCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Lausanne, 1066 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9541-9749
Nancy B HopfCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Lausanne, 1066 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4490-6109
Pascal WildNational Research and Safety Institute (INRS), 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3165-3808
Guillaume SuárezCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Lausanne, 1066 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Irina Guseva CanuCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Lausanne, 1066 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-8421

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation IZCOZ0_177067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several methods for quantifying malondialdehyde (MDA), an oxidative stress biomarker, in exhaled breath condensate (EBC). However, due to the very diluted nature of this biological matrix, a high variability is observed at low concentrations. We aimed to optimize a 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine-based method using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry and characterize the uncertainty associated with this method. We investigated the following parameters for the method validation: calibration linearity, limit of detection (LOD), precision, recovery, and matrix effect. The results were used to identify the main sources of uncertainty and calculating the combined uncertainty. The applicability of this method was evaluated in an ongoing epidemiological study by analyzing 164 EBC samples collected from different professional groups in subway environments. The optimized method was sensitive (LOD: 70 pg/mL), precise (inter-day variation < 19%) and accurate (recovery range: 92-106.5%). The calculated analytical uncertainty was the highest at the LOQ level and reached 23%. Although the analytical uncertainty was high at low MDA concentrations, it was significantly lower than that the observed inter-individual variability. Hence, this method performs sufficiently well and can be recommended for future use in epidemiological researches relying on between-subject differences.

Indexed as

exhaled breath condensatemalondialdehydeoxidative stress biomarkersuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID34829532
PMCPMC8615247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.