ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Cholera Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-Term Kinetics of Serological Antibodies againstInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Decentralised rapid diagnostic tests enable cholera diagnosis by non-laboratory health workers during outbreaks in Cameroon.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Simple and Rapid Diagnostic Test RLDT for the Detection of Cholera in Bangladesh.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Cholera Sicca: A Rare and Atypical Presentation of Vibrio cholerae Infection Mimicking Bowel Obstruction.Cureus · 2025Article
- Dynamics of IgM and IgA Antibody Response Profile AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Cholera in Syria, a crisis following crises: Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice in a cohort of syrian population.Heliyon · 2023Article
- A minireview of cholera outbreak in Lebanon - a rising public health concern.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Review of Rapid Diagnostic Methods forThe East African health research journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid diagnosis of cholera contributes to adequate outbreak management. This meta-analysis assesses the diagnostic accuracy of cholera rapid tests (RDTs) to detect
methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis. We searched four databases (Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science up to 8 September 2021) for studies that evaluated cholera RDTs for the detection of
resultsOverall, 20 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Studies were from Africa (
conclusionsAgainst culture or PCR, current cholera RDTs have moderate sensitivity and specificity for detecting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.