Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34829405›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Clinical or Imaging Diagnosis of the Current Medical Practice for Superior Vena Cava Syndrome?

Liliana Dragomir, Virginia Marina, Mihaela Anghele, Aurelian-Dumitrache Anghele

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liliana DragomirClinical-Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.
Virginia MarinaMedical Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-734X
Mihaela AngheleMedical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.
Aurelian-Dumitrache AngheleDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cases of superior vena cava syndrome are easily diagnosed bya clinical examination alone, but several diagnostic tests and procedures can be helpful. When a patient presentswith a suspected diagnosis of superior vena cava syndrome, the first step is to obtain an imaging study that confirms the diagnosis and aids treatment decisions. Magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced CT scanning, radionuclide flow studies and traditional venography are all appropriate techniques. Still, the CT scan is the most readily available technology in most centers. The CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging also provide information on possible etiologies and can therefore direct the approach towards a tissue diagnosis.

Indexed as

clinical diagnosissuperiorvena cava syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34829405
PMCPMC8623254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.