Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34829403›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Radionuclide Imaging of Invasive Fungal Disease in Immunocompromised Hosts.

Ismaheel O Lawal, Kgomotso M G Mokoala, Mankgopo M Kgatle, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Andor W J M Glaudemans, Mike M Sathekge, Alfred O Ankrah

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The additional value ofRespiratory research · 2024
    Article
  5. The FVirulence · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ismaheel O LawalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-040X
Kgomotso M G MokoalaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3784-4090
Mankgopo M KgatleDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Rudi A J O DierckxMedical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Andor W J M GlaudemansMedical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8081-0641
Mike M SathekgeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-0625
Alfred O AnkrahDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Steve Biko Hospital · ZAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) leads to increased mortality, morbidity, and costs of treatment in patients with immunosuppressive conditions. The definitive diagnosis of IFD relies on the isolation of the causative fungal agents through microscopy, culture, or nucleic acid testing in tissue samples obtained from the sites of the disease. Biopsy is not always feasible or safe to be undertaken in immunocompromised hosts at risk of IFD. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques are, therefore, needed for the diagnosis and treatment response assessment of IFD. The available techniques that identify fungal-specific antigens in biological samples for diagnosing IFD have variable sensitivity and specificity. They also have limited utility in response assessment. Imaging has, therefore, been applied for the noninvasive detection of IFD. Morphologic imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most applied technique. These techniques are neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for the early diagnosis of IFD. Morphologic changes evaluated by CT and MRI occur later in the disease course and during recovery after successful treatment. These modalities may, therefore, not be ideal for early diagnosis and early response to therapy determination. Radionuclide imaging allows for targeting the host response to pathogenic fungi or specific structures of the pathogen itself. This makes radionuclide imaging techniques suitable for the early diagnosis and treatment response assessment of IFD. In this review, we aimed to discuss the interplay of host immunity, immunosuppression, and the occurrence of IFD. We also discuss the currently available radionuclide probes that have been evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies for their ability to detect IFD.

Indexed as

[18F]FDG PET/CTHIVimmunosuppressioninvasive fungal diseaseradionuclide imaging

Identifiers

PMID34829403
PMCPMC8620393
OpenAlexW3214268932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.