Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34829142›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Innovative Preservation Methods Improving the Quality and Safety of Fish Products: Beneficial Effects and Limits.

Barbara Speranza, Angela Racioppo, Antonio Bevilacqua, Veronica Buzzo, Piera Marigliano, Ester Mocerino, Raffaella Scognamiglio, Maria Rosaria Corbo, Gennaro Scognamiglio, Milena Sinigaglia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Food preservatives: natural or synthetic?Archives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara SperanzaDepartment of Agriculture Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Angela RacioppoDepartment of Agriculture Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2368-3628
Antonio BevilacquaDepartment of Agriculture Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-9186
Veronica BuzzoUNCI AGROALIMENTARE, Via San Sotero 32, 00165 Roma, Italy.
Piera MariglianoUNCI AGROALIMENTARE, Via San Sotero 32, 00165 Roma, Italy.
Ester MocerinoUNCI AGROALIMENTARE, Via San Sotero 32, 00165 Roma, Italy.
Raffaella ScognamiglioUNCI AGROALIMENTARE, Via San Sotero 32, 00165 Roma, Italy.
Maria Rosaria CorboDepartment of Agriculture Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3420-5445
Gennaro ScognamiglioUNCI AGROALIMENTARE, Via San Sotero 32, 00165 Roma, Italy.
Milena SinigagliaDepartment of Agriculture Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
University of Foggia · IT

Funding

Regione Puglia CUP B71B17000990009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish products are highly perishable, requiring proper processing to maintain their quality and safety during the entire storage. Different from traditional methods used to extend the shelf-life of these products (smoking, salting, marinating, icing, chilling, freezing, drying, boiling, steaming, etc.), in recent years, some alternative methods have been proposed as innovative processing technologies able to guarantee the extension of their shelf-life while minimally affecting their organoleptic properties. The present review aims to describe the primary mechanisms of some of these innovative methods applied to preserve quality and safety of fish products; namely, non-thermal atmospheric plasma (NTAP), pulsed electric fields (PEF), pulsed light (PL), ultrasounds (US) and electrolyzed water (EW) are analysed, focusing on the main results of the studies published over the last 10 years. The limits and the benefits of each method are addressed in order to provide a global overview about these promising emerging technologies and to facilitate their greater use at industrial level. In general, all the innovative methods analysed in this review have shown a good effectiveness to control microbial growth in fish products maintaining their organoleptic, nutritional and sensory characteristics. Most of the technologies have also shown the great advantage to have a lower energy consumption and shorter production times. In contrast, not all the methods are in the same development stage; thus, we suggest further investigations to develop one (or more) hurdle-like non-thermal method able to meet both food production requirements and the modern consumers' demand.

Indexed as

electrolyzed waterfishnon-thermal atmospheric plasmapulsed electric fieldspulsed lightspoilageultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34829142
PMCPMC8622261
OpenAlexW3211789539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.