Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34829011›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Individual Differences in the Perception of Oral Chemesthesis Are Linked to Taste Sensitivity.

Sulo Roukka, Sari Puputti, Heikki Aisala, Ulla Hoppu, Laila Seppä, Mari A Sandell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 1: sensory mechanisms.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sulo RoukkaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Sari PuputtiFunctional Foods Forum, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-0064
Heikki AisalaFunctional Foods Forum, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2884-2026
Ulla HoppuFunctional Foods Forum, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
Laila SeppäDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Mari A SandellDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-1050

Funding

Academy of Finland 252005Academy of Finland 256176Academy of Finland 263747Academy of Finland 309408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemesthesis is a part of the flavor experience of foods. Chemesthetic perception is studied to understand its effect on food-related behavior and health. Thus, the objective of this research was to study individual differences in chemesthetic perception. Our study involved sensory tests of three chemesthetic modalities (astringency, pungency, and cooling). Participants (

Indexed as

chemesthesischemesthesis sensitivityhierarchical clusteringindividual differencesintensityperceptionsensitivitytaste sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID34829011
PMCPMC8618882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.