Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828951›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

DNA Accounting: Tallying Genomes to Detect Adulterated Saffron.

Antoon Lievens, Valentina Paracchini, Danilo Pietretti, Linda Garlant, Alain Maquet, Franz Ulberth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antoon LievensEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, B-2440 Geel, Belgium.
Valentina ParacchiniEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, I-21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-9992
Danilo PietrettiEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, B-2440 Geel, Belgium.
Linda GarlantEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, B-2440 Geel, Belgium.
Alain MaquetEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, B-2440 Geel, Belgium.
Franz UlberthEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, B-2440 Geel, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EU General Food Law not only aims at ensuring food safety but also to 'prevent fraudulent or deceptive practices; the adulteration of food; and any other practices which may mislead the consumer'. Especially the partial or complete, deliberate, and intentional substitution of valuable ingredients (e.g., Saffron) for less valuable ones is of concern. Due to the variety of products on the market an approach to detect food adulteration that works well for one species may not be easily applicable to another. Here we present a broadly applicable approach for the detection of substitution of biological materials based on digital PCR. By simultaneously measuring and forecasting the number of genome copies in a sample, fraud is detectable as a discrepancy between these two values. Apart from the choice of target gene, the procedure is identical across all species. It is scalable, rapid, and has a high dynamic range. We provide proof of concept by presenting the analysis of 141 samples of Saffron (

Indexed as

digital PCRfood fraudnext generation sequencingsaffron

Identifiers

PMID34828951
PMCPMC8624925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.