Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828914›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Nanotechnology as a Processing and Packaging Tool to Improve Meat Quality and Safety.

Melisa Lamri, Tanima Bhattacharya, Fatma Boukid, Imene Chentir, Amira Leila Dib, Debashrita Das, Djamel Djenane, Mohammed Gagaoua

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Boosting nutritional value: the role of iron fortification in meat and meat products.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Nanotechnology: A Revolution in Modern Industry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Melisa LamriLaboratory of Food Quality and Food Safety, Department of Food technology, Université Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi-Ouzou 15000, Algeria.
Tanima BhattacharyaInnovation, Incubation & Industry (I-Cube) Laboratory, Techno India NJR Institute of Technology, Udaipur 313003, India.
Fatma BoukidFood Safety and Functionality Programme, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), 17121 Monells, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-6351
Imene ChentirLaboratory of Food, Processing, Control and Agroressources Valorization, Higher School of Food Science and Agri-Food Industry, Algiers 16200, Algeria.
Amira Leila DibGSPA Research Laboratory, Institut des Sciences Vétérinaires, Université Frères Mentouri Constantine 1, Constantine 25000 Algeria.
Debashrita DasSchool of Community Science & Technology, IIEST Shibpur, Howrah 711103, India.
Djamel DjenaneLaboratory of Food Quality and Food Safety, Department of Food technology, Université Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi-Ouzou 15000, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0003-4050-4329
Mohammed GagaouaFood Quality and Sensory Science Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, D15 KN3K Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6913-3379
Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou · DZIndian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur · INInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity Frères Mentouri Constantine 1 · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles are gaining momentum as a smart tool towards a safer, more cost-effective and sustainable food chain. This study aimed to provide an overview of the potential uses, preparation, properties, and applications of nanoparticles to process and preserve fresh meat and processed meat products. Nanoparticles can be used to reinforce the packaging material resulting in the improvement of sensory, functional, and nutritional aspects of meat and processed meat products. Further, these particles can be used in smart packaging as biosensors to extend the shelf-life of fresh and processed meat products and also to monitor the final quality of these products during the storage period. Nanoparticles are included in product formulation as carriers of health-beneficial and/or functional ingredients. They showed great efficiency in encapsulating bioactive ingredients and preserving their properties to ensure their functionality (e.g., antioxidant and antimicrobial) in meat products. As a result, nanoparticles can efficiently contribute to ensuring product safety and quality whilst reducing wastage and costs. Nevertheless, a wider implementation of nanotechnology in meat industry is highly related to its economic value, consumers' acceptance, and the regulatory framework. Being a novel technology, concerns over the toxicity of nanoparticles are still controversial and therefore efficient analytical tools are deemed crucial for the identification and quantification of nanocomponents in meat products. Thus, migration studies about nanoparticles from the packaging into meat and meat products are still a concern as it has implications for human health associated with their toxicity. Moreover, focused economic evaluations for implementing nanoparticles in meat packaging are crucial since the current literature is still scarce and targeted studies are needed before further industrial applications.

Indexed as

food packagingfood safetygreen technologymeatnanosensorsnanotechnologysilver nanoparticlesspoilage

Identifiers

PMID34828914
PMCPMC8623812
OpenAlexW3210439117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.