Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828880›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Dry Pet Food Flavor Enhancers and Their Impact on Palatability: A Review.

Shilpa S Samant, Philip Glen Crandall, Sara E Jarma Arroyo, Han-Seok Seo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gaps and Controversies in Feline Food Palatability.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Protective effects of turmerosaccharides rich extract ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Protein hydrolysates fromTranslational animal science · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shilpa S SamantDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Philip Glen CrandallDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Sara E Jarma ArroyoDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Han-Seok SeoDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-8199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pet foods are a vital component of the global food industry. Pet food's success depends on its acceptance by both consumers (the pets) and purchasers (the pet owners). Palatability tests using panels of both trained and untrained pets are often used to measure the preference and acceptability of pet foods. Human perception of pet foods is usually determined by descriptive sensory analysis. Since dry pet foods (also known as kibbles), while being the most popular, are the least palatable, palatants as a flavor enhancer are generally added to dry pet foods to increase their acceptability to pets. Pet foods can also be prepared to be more appealing to pet owners if the chosen aromas and flavors are commonly associated with human food. With increasing demand, developing flavor enhancers to meet the needs of both pets and owners is becoming increasingly important. This review summarized the current state of flavor enhancers used in the pet food industry and their influence on food palatability from both animal and human standpoints.

Indexed as

dry dog foodflavor enhancerpalatabilitypalatantspetpet food

Identifiers

PMID34828880
PMCPMC8622411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.