ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Brazilian Consumers' Attitudes towards So-Called "Cell-Based Meat".
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Monitoring and Engineering Stable and Safe Immortalized Cell Platforms for Industrial Cellular Agriculture.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cultured Meat Reformulation: Health Potential and Sustainable Food Challenges-Narrative Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
- How much do opinions regarding cultivated meat vary within the same country? The cases of São Paulo and Salvador, Brazil.PloS one · 2025Article
- Investigation of the relationship between adoption of minimalist and sustainable lifestyle, and individuals' views on artificial meat.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Consumer Response to Novel Foods: A Review of Behavioral Barriers and Drivers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- AFrontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- German consumers' attitudes toward artificial meat.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Exploring Ethical, Ecological, and Health Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Cultured Meat among Generation Y and Generation Z.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Meat in the Diet: Differentiating the Benefits and Risks of Different Types of Meat.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Tissue Engineering Challenges for Cultivated Meat to Meet the Real Demand of a Global Market.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Consumer perception of "artificial meat" in the educated young and urban population of Africa.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Perception of cultured "meat" by Italian, Portuguese and Spanish consumers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Cultured Meat on the Social Network Twitter: Clean, Future and Sustainable Meats.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main goal of this online survey was to investigate the attitudes of Brazilians towards "cell-based meat", which has become the subject of great scientific and media enthusiasm. The answers of 4471 respondents concluded that 46.6% of them thought "cell-based meat" was promising and acceptable. More than 66% would be willing to try this novel product compared to 23% who expressed reluctance to do so. Nearly 40% of the total respondents did not want to eat "cell-based meat" regularly at all, whereas 29%, 43.2%, and 39.9% were willing to eat it regularly in restaurants, at home, and/or in ready-made meals, respectively. However, the majority of respondents (71%) were keen to pay much less for "cell-based meat" than conventionally produced meat (or even nothing at all), compared to 24.3% who were willing to pay the same price as conventional meat, whereas only 4.8% were willing to pay more. Approximately 51% of them considered that "cell-based meat" should not be called "meat" for marketing purposes. Job, monthly income, age, and gender were major factors impacting consumer acceptance. Meat professionals and consumers with higher incomes were less willing to eat "cell-based meat" regularly. Women (especially younger women) were the most concerned about the ethical and environmental issues related to meat production and were the most convinced that reducing meat consumption could be a good solution to the meat industry's problems. Respondents who did not accept "cell-based meat" and did not eat meat substitutes had a negative attitude to this novel food (they considered it absurd and/or disgusting) and did not believe that "cell-based meat" should be called "meat" for marketing purposes. In contrast, the people who thought that "cell-based meat" could be called "meat" perceived it in a rather positive way. These results are important for consumers of meat and meat substitutes and for companies aiming to enter the potential future Brazilian market of "cell-based meat".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.