Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828802›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Sensory Traits and Consumer's Perceived Quality of Traditional and Modern Fresh Market Tomato Varieties: A Study in Three European Countries.

Fiorella Sinesio, Maria Cammareri, Valentine Cottet, Lilian Fontanet, Michel Jost, Elisabetta Moneta, Samuela Palombieri, Marina Peparaio, Roser Romero Del Castillo, Eleonora Saggia Civitelli and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fiorella SinesioCREA-Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria-Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Maria CammareriInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, Research Division Portici, CNR-National Research Council of Italy, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Valentine CottetCTIFL, Centre de Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, Route de Mollégès, 13210 Saint Remy de Provence, France.
Lilian FontanetINRAE, UR1052, GAFL, Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Domaine Saint Maurice, Allée des Chênes, CS 60094, CEDEX, 84143 Montfavet, France.
Michel JostCTIFL, Centre de Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, Route de Mollégès, 13210 Saint Remy de Provence, France.
Elisabetta MonetaCREA-Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria-Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Samuela PalombieriInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, Research Division Portici, CNR-National Research Council of Italy, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-3428
Marina PeparaioCREA-Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria-Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Roser Romero Del CastilloFundació Miquel Agustí-UPC BarcelonaTech, Barcelona School of Agricultural Engineering, c. Esteve Terrades, 8, 08860 Castelldefels, Spain.
Eleonora Saggia CivitelliCREA-Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria-Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Patrizia SpignoARCA 2010 Soc. Coop. Snc, 81030 Teverola, Italy.
Antonella VitielloInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, Research Division Portici, CNR-National Research Council of Italy, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Brigitte NavezCTIFL, Centre de Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, Route de Mollégès, 13210 Saint Remy de Provence, France.
Joan CasalsFundació Miquel Agustí-UPC BarcelonaTech, Barcelona School of Agricultural Engineering, c. Esteve Terrades, 8, 08860 Castelldefels, Spain.
Mathilde CausseINRAE, UR1052, GAFL, Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Domaine Saint Maurice, Allée des Chênes, CS 60094, CEDEX, 84143 Montfavet, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-4985
Antonio GranellInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas, CSIC, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4266-9581
Silvana GrandilloInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, Research Division Portici, CNR-National Research Council of Italy, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources · ITEsteve (Spain) · ESInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas · ES

Funding

European Commission 634561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer dissatisfaction with the flavor quality of many modern fresh market tomato varieties has fostered breeders' interest in sensory quality improvement, and the demand for traditional varieties, which are generally associated with better flavor. To achieve further knowledge on the factors influencing the sensory quality and consumers' preferences and perception, European traditional and modern fresh market tomato varieties were grown and evaluated in France, Italy, and Spain. Different growing conditions were tested in France (soilless vs. soil) and in Spain (open field vs. greenhouse), while in Italy fruits were evaluated at two ripening stages. Fruit quality was assessed by integrating physicochemical analyses, sensory profiles, and consumer tests. In all three countries, overall modern varieties were perceived as having more intense "tomato flavor" and "overall flavor" than traditional ones. In France and Spain, consumers' preferences were more oriented towards modern varieties than traditional ones. Significant growing condition effects were found on sensory and physicochemical traits, while the effect on consumers' overall liking was not significant, largely depending on the genotype. A fair agreement between product configurations from descriptive analysis by trained assessors and Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) questions by consumers was observed. Penalty-lift analysis based on CATA allowed identifying positive and negative drivers of liking.

Indexed as

CATAfruit qualitygenotype-by-environment interactionhedonic ratinglandracesphysicochemicalsensory profileSolanum lycopersicum L.

Identifiers

PMID34828802
PMCPMC8620402
OpenAlexW3206489502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.