Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828724›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Dyslexia Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Rhythm-Based Intervention for Reading.

Alice Cancer, Daniela Sarti, Marinella De Salvatore, Elisa Granocchio, Daniela Pia Rosaria Chieffo, Alessandro Antonietti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04995471 (Comparing the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation vs. in Presence Rehabilitation of Reading Disorders, Using a Rhythm-based Intervention for Reading), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04995471 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparing the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation vs. in Presence Rehabilitation of Reading Disorders, Using a Rhythm-based Intervention for Reading (Rhythmic Reading Training, RRT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCatholic University of the Sacred HeartRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsDevelopmental DyslexiaArmsIn presence RRT - prototype software, In presence RRT - online platform, Tele-RRT - prototype software, Tele-RRT - online platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alice CancerDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3545-8540
Daniela SartiDevelopmental Neurology Unit-Language and Learning Disorders Service, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2165-5757
Marinella De SalvatoreDevelopmental Neurology Unit-Language and Learning Disorders Service, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Elisa GranocchioDevelopmental Neurology Unit-Language and Learning Disorders Service, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Daniela Pia Rosaria ChieffoDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro AntoniettiDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7212-8076
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak necessitated a reorganization of the rehabilitation practices for Learning Disorders (LDs). During the lockdown phase, telerehabilitation offered the possibility to continue training interventions while enabling social distancing. Given such an advantage of telerehabilitation methods for LDs, clinical research is still needed to test the effectiveness of diverse teletraining approaches by comparing their outcomes with those of face-to-face interventions. To compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation vs. in-presence rehabilitation of dyslexia, a rhythm-based intervention for reading, called Rhythmic Reading Training (RRT), was tested in a small-scale clinical trial during the lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirty children aged 8-13 with a diagnosis of developmental dyslexia were assigned to either a telerehabilitation or an in-presence rehabilitation setting and received RRT for 10 biweekly sessions of 45 min, supervised by a trained practitioner. The results showed that both telerehabilitation and in-presence rehabilitation were effective in improving reading and rapid automatized naming in children with dyslexia and that the effects were comparable between settings. Therefore, RRT was found to be effective in spite of the administration method (remote or in-presence). These results confirm the potential of telemedicine for the rehabilitation of LDs. Clinical Trial ID: NCT04995471.

Indexed as

dyslexiainterventionmusic therapyrhythmtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34828724
PMCPMC8624373
OpenAlexW3213420032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.