Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828698›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Health Technology Assessment of Intensive Care Ventilators for Pediatric Patients.

Martina Andellini, Francesco Faggiano, Sergio Giuseppe Picardo, Giuseppina Testa, Daniela Perrotta, Roberto Bianchi, Federico Nocchi, Carlo Capussotto, Elena Bassanelli, Pietro Derrico and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina AndelliniHTA Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2931-0753
Francesco FaggianoHTA Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Sergio Giuseppe PicardoDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppina TestaPaediatric Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Daniela PerrottaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9926-6292
Roberto BianchiDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Federico NocchiClinical Engineering Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Carlo CapussottoClinical Engineering Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Elena BassanelliHTA and Safety Research Unit, Scientific Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Pietro DerricoHTA and Safety Research Unit, Scientific Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Nicola PirozziPaediatric Emergency Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Leandro PecchiaSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Matteo RitrovatoHTA Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3686-6108
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is aimed at addressing all the critical aspects linked to the implementation of intensive care ventilators in a pediatric setting, highlighting the most relevant technical features and describing the methodology to conduct health technology assessment (HTA) for supporting the decision-making process. Four ventilator models were included in the assessment process. A decision-making support tool (DoHTA method) was applied. Twenty-eight Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were identified, defining the safety, clinical effectiveness, organizational, technical, and economic aspects. The Performance scores of each ventilator have been measured with respect to KPIs integrated with the total cost of ownership analysis, leading to a final rank of the four possible technological solutions. The final technologies' performance scores reflected a deliver valued, contextualized, and shared outputs, detecting the most performant technological solution for the specific hospital context. HTA results had informed and supported the pediatric hospital decision-making process. This study, critically identifying the pros and cons of innovative features of ventilators and the evaluation criteria and aspects to be taken into account during HTA, can be considered as a valuable proof of evidence as well as a reliable and transferable method for conducting decision-making processes in a hospital context.

Indexed as

hospital decision makingHTAintensive care unitintensive care ventilatormulti criteria decision analysispediatric

Identifiers

PMID34828698
PMCPMC8621341
OpenAlexW3210128592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.