Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828650›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Perceived Usefulness of Telerehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Belgium-France Pilot Study during Second Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Frédéric Dierick, Amélie Pierre, Loredana Profeta, Frédéric Telliez, Fabien Buisseret

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Frédéric DierickCeREF Technique, Chaussée de Binche 159, 7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-0968
Amélie PierreCentre FoRS, Département Social Namur, Domaine de l'information et de la Communication et Domaine des Sciences Politiques et Sociales, Haute École Namur-Liège-Luxembourg-HENALLUX, Rue de l'Arsenal 10, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Loredana ProfetaForme and Fonctionnement Humain Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, Haute Ecole Louvain en Hainautrue, Trieu Kaisin 136, 6061 Montignies sur Sambre, Belgium.
Frédéric TelliezInstitut d'Ingénierie de la Santé-UFR de Médecine, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Rue des Louvels, 80036 Amiens, France.
Fabien BuisseretCeREF Technique, Chaussée de Binche 159, 7000 Mons, Belgium.
Haute École Louvain en Hainaut · BELaboratoire National de Santé · LUUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRUniversity of Mons · BEUniversity of Namur · BE

Funding

Interreg FWVl n° 4.7.360 NOMADe
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has affected the practice of physiotherapy, and telerehabilitation (TR) may be seen as an alternative model of care if it is accepted by patients and physiotherapists. This study investigates the perceived usefulness of TR and the intention to use it among physiotherapists and patients from Belgium and France concerned with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) during the pandemic period.

methodsAn online questionnaire based on the technology-acceptance model was designed. Sociodemographic data were collected and Likert scales were proposed to assess perceived ease-of-use, perceived usefulness and intention to use TR. Data were collected between 17 January and 17 March 2021; 68 patients and 107 physiotherapists answered.

resultsIn total, 88% of patients and 76% physiotherapists had not used TR at the time they answered. Only 12% of patients and 1% of physiotherapists are willing to use TR, and 50% of physiotherapists think they will never use TR compared to 25% of patients. A total of 98% of participants agreed that they had a good mastery of the technological tools requested.

conclusionsPhysiotherapists are more reluctant to use TR than patients, regardless of convincing EBM results. This is related to their own representation of proper MSD management, which must include the use of hands-on techniques.

Indexed as

acceptabilitye-healthmusculoskeletal diseasesurveytelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34828650
PMCPMC8623841
OpenAlexW3215310446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.