Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828569›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Portuguese Model of Home Respiratory Care: Healthcare Professionals' Perspective.

Cátia Caneiras, Cristina Jácome, Daniela Oliveira, Emília Moreira, Cláudia Camila Dias, Liliane Mendonça, Sagrario Mayoralas-Alises, João Almeida Fonseca, Salvador Diaz-Lobato, Joan Escarrabill and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cátia CaneirasMicrobiology Research Laboratory on Environmental Health (EnviHealthMicro Lab), Institute of Environmental Health (ISAMB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3735-8554
Cristina JácomeCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1151-8791
Daniela OliveiraCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Emília MoreiraCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Cláudia Camila DiasCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Liliane MendonçaCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1057-7893
Sagrario Mayoralas-AlisesHealthcare Management Department, Hospital Quirón Salud San José, 28002 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1207-8724
João Almeida FonsecaCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-8796
Salvador Diaz-LobatoHealthcare Department, Nippon Gases Spain, 28020 Madrid, Spain.
Joan EscarrabillPrograma de Atención a la Cronicidad, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
João Carlos WinckDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2444-8710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' and carers' views regarding the Portuguese model of home respiratory care were recently described, yet the complementary perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is still to be investigated. Thus, this study explored HCPs experience in the management of patients needing home respiratory therapies (HRT), and their perspective about the Portuguese model. A phenomenological descriptive study, using focus groups, was carried out with 28 HCPs (median 42 y, 68% female) with distinct backgrounds (57% pulmonologists, 29% clinical physiologists, 7% physiotherapists, 7% nurses). Three focus groups were conducted in three regions of Portugal. Thematic analysis was performed by two independent researchers. HCPs have in general a positive view about the organization of the Portuguese model of home respiratory care, which was revealed in four major topics: Prescription (number of references,

Indexed as

focus groupsHome care serviceslong-term caremechanical ventilationoxygen inhalation therapyquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID34828569
PMCPMC8623333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.