Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828532›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

ART Innovations: Fostering Women's Psychophysical Health between Bioethics Precepts and Human Rights.

Simona Zaami, Lorenza Driul, Milena Sansone, Elisa Scatena, Karin Louise Andersson, Enrico Marinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simona ZaamiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Medicolegal and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7139
Lorenza DriulClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Udine, DAME, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Milena SansoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Elisa ScatenaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Santo Stefano Hospital, 59100 Prato, Italy.
Karin Louise AnderssonDepartment of Territory Health, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Centro, 50012 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-1694
Enrico MarinelliDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Medicolegal and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7104-8744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility is a highly relevant global issue affecting the reproductive health of at least 15% of reproductive-aged couples worldwide. The scope and severity of the infertility problem is even more prevalent in developing countries, mostly due to untreated reproductive tract infections (RTIs). Infertility, however, goes beyond the mere inability to procreate, but brings about profound psychological, social, and ethical implications of enormous magnitude. In vitro fertilization (IVF) and other assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) have gradually become widespread therapeutic options. After all, the implementation of medically assisted reproductive procedures in order to overcome infertility is in keeping with the tenets of the reproductive rights agenda laid out at the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in Cairo in 1994. Nonetheless, concerns still linger about how to implement and regulate such interventions in an ethically tenable fashion. The unremitting pace at which such techniques develop have upset the very notion of sexuality relating to reproduction as well as the concept of family itself. That rift risks causing a crisis in terms of bioethics sustainability and enforcement, which is bound to happen when science and innovation outpace the bioethical precepts on which we rely for essential guidance in medical practice. The authors argue in favor of an approach to regulation and policy-making that puts on the forefront a thorough assessment as to potential risks that such interventions might entail for foundational bioethics principles and inalienable human rights.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologies (ART)female infertilityprocreative rightspsychophysical well-being

Identifiers

PMID34828532
PMCPMC8623993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.