Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828372›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Roland A H van Oorschot, Georgina E Meakin, Bas Kokshoorn, Mariya Goray, Bianca Szkuta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current state: Assessing DNA results considering transfer.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Forensic genetics in the omics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roland A H van OorschotOffice of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, Macleod, VIC 3085, Australia.
Georgina E MeakinCentre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9223-3017
Bas KokshoornNetherlands Forensic Institute, 2497 GB The Hague, The Netherlands.
Mariya GorayCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0834-2895
Bianca SzkutaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-5355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the factors that may impact the transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery of DNA (DNA-TPPR), and the availability of data to assign probabilities to DNA quantities and profile types being obtained given particular scenarios and circumstances, is paramount when performing, and giving guidance on, evaluations of DNA findings given activity level propositions (activity level evaluations). In late 2018 and early 2019, three major reviews were published on aspects of DNA-TPPR, with each advocating the need for further research and other actions to support the conduct of DNA-related activity level evaluations. Here, we look at how challenges are being met, primarily by providing a synopsis of DNA-TPPR-related articles published since the conduct of these reviews and briefly exploring some of the actions taken by industry stakeholders towards addressing identified gaps. Much has been carried out in recent years, and efforts continue, to meet the challenges to continually improve the capacity of forensic experts to provide the guidance sought by the judiciary with respect to the transfer of DNA.

Indexed as

DNADNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsHumansSpecimen HandlingDNAactivity level evaluationDNA persistenceDNA prevalenceDNA recoveryDNA transferforensic science

Identifiers

PMID34828372
PMCPMC8618004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.