Intraspecific Genetic Variation for Behavioral Isolation Loci in

Jessica A Pardy, Samia Lahib, Mohamed A F Noor, Amanda J Moehring

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

Do genetic loci that cause reproductive isolation in the lab inhibit gene flow in nature?Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica A PardyDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.

Samia LahibDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.

Mohamed A F NoorBiology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5400-4408

Amanda J MoehringDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8088-4007

Western University · CADuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral isolation is considered to be the primary mode of species isolation, and the lack of identification of individual genes for behavioral isolation has hindered our ability to address fundamental questions about the process of speciation. One of the major questions that remains about behavioral isolation is whether the genetic basis of isolation between species also varies within a species. Indeed, the extent to which genes for isolation may vary across a population is rarely explored. Here, we bypass the problem of individual gene identification by addressing this question using a quantitative genetic comparison. Using strains from eight different populations of

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationSocial IsolationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophilaFemaleGenes, InsectGenetic VariationMaleQuantitative Trait LociSexual Behavior, AnimalSpecies Specificitybehaviorgenetic variationquantitative geneticsreproductive isolationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID34828309

DOI10.3390/genes12111703

PMCPMC8619000

OpenAlexW3208924281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.