Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828294›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

Revisiting Plant Heterosis-From Field Scale to Molecules.

Attiq Ur Rehman, Trang Dang, Shanzay Qamar, Amina Ilyas, Reemana Fatema, Madan Kafle, Zawar Hussain, Sara Masood, Shehyar Iqbal, Khurram Shahzad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing Genetic Variation amongPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Predicting heterosisFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Attiq Ur RehmanHorticulture Technologies, Production Systems Unit, Natural Resources Institute (Luke), Toivonlinnantie 518, 21500 Piikkiö, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0131-3928
Trang DangInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-5333
Shanzay QamarDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Science, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Amina IlyasDepartment of Botany, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-869X
Reemana FatemaDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3563-7859
Madan KafleDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, The University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Zawar HussainEnvironmental and Plant Biology Department, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
Sara MasoodUniversity Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences (UIDNS), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Shehyar IqbalIMPLANTEUS Graduate School, Avignon Université, 84000 Avignon, France.
Khurram ShahzadDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, The University of Haripur, Haripur 22620, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3493-7016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosis refers to the increase in biomass, stature, fertility, and other characters that impart superior performance to the F1 progeny over genetically diverged parents. The manifestation of heterosis brought an economic revolution to the agricultural production and seed sector in the last few decades. Initially, the idea was exploited in cross-pollinated plants, but eventually acquired serious attention in self-pollinated crops as well. Regardless of harvesting the benefits of heterosis, a century-long discussion is continued to understand the underlying basis of this phenomenon. The massive increase in knowledge of various fields of science such as genetics, epigenetics, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics persistently provide new insights to understand the reasons for the expression of hybrid vigor. In this review, we have gathered information ranging from classical genetic studies, field experiments to various high-throughput omics and computational modelling studies in order to understand the underlying basis of heterosis. The modern-day science has worked significantly to pull off our understanding of heterosis yet leaving open questions that requires further research and experimentation. Answering these questions would possibly equip today's plant breeders with efficient tools and accurate choices to breed crops for a sustainable future.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCrops, AgriculturalGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHybridization, GeneticHybrid VigorPlant Breedingcrop plantsgenetic modelsheterosishybrid vigorinbreeding depressionmolecular basis

Identifiers

PMID34828294
PMCPMC8619659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.