Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828255›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Precision DNA Mixture Interpretation with Single-Cell Profiling.

Jianye Ge, Jonathan L King, Amy Smuts, Bruce Budowle

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New Perspectives for Whole Genome Amplification in Forensic STR Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianye GeCenter for Human Identification, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8724-075X
Jonathan L KingCenter for Human Identification, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-1789
Amy SmutsCenter for Human Identification, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
Bruce BudowleCenter for Human Identification, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wet-lab based studies have exploited emerging single-cell technologies to address the challenges of interpreting forensic mixture evidence. However, little effort has been dedicated to developing a systematic approach to interpreting the single-cell profiles derived from the mixtures. This study is the first attempt to develop a comprehensive interpretation workflow in which single-cell profiles from mixtures are interpreted individually and holistically. In this approach, the genotypes from each cell are assessed, the number of contributors (NOC) of the single-cell profiles is estimated, followed by developing a consensus profile of each contributor, and finally the consensus profile(s) can be used for a DNA database search or comparing with known profiles to determine their potential sources. The potential of this single-cell interpretation workflow was assessed by simulation with various mixture scenarios and empirical allele drop-out and drop-in rates, the accuracies of estimating the NOC, the accuracies of recovering the true alleles by consensus, and the capabilities of deconvolving mixtures with related contributors. The results support that the single-cell based mixture interpretation can provide a precision that cannot beachieved with current standard CE-STR analyses. A new paradigm for mixture interpretation is available to enhance the interpretation of forensic genetic casework.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsAlgorithmsAllelesCluster AnalysisDNADNA ContaminationDNA FingerprintingGenetic TechniquesGenotypeHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsSingle-Cell AnalysisDNAclustering algorithmconsensus profileDNA forensicsDNA mixturemixture interpretationnumber of contributorssingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID34828255
PMCPMC8623868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.