ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Thermodynamic Consistency of the Cushman Method of Computing the Configurational Entropy of a Landscape Lattice.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complexity and entropy of natural patterns.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Multispectral Remote Sensing Data Application in Modelling Non-Extensive Tsallis Thermodynamics for Mountain Forests in Northern Mongolia.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Entropy, Ecology and Evolution: Toward a Unified Philosophy of Biology.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Editorial: The role of entropy and information in evolution.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Generalizing Boltzmann Configurational Entropy to Surfaces, Point Patterns and Landscape Mosaics.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Entropy in Landscape Ecology: A Quantitative Textual Multivariate Review.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a recent surge of interest in theory and methods for calculating the entropy of landscape patterns, but relatively little is known about the thermodynamic consistency of these approaches. I posit that for any of these methods to be fully thermodynamically consistent, they must meet three conditions. First, the computed entropies must lie along the theoretical distribution of entropies as a function of total edge length, which Cushman showed was a parabolic function following from the fact that there is a normal distribution of permuted edge lengths, the entropy is the logarithm of the number of microstates in a macrostate, and the logarithm of a normal distribution is a parabolic function. Second, the entropy must increase over time through the period of the random mixing simulation, following the expectation that entropy increases in a closed system. Third, at full mixing, the entropy will fluctuate randomly around the maximum theoretical value, associated with a perfectly random arrangement of the lattice. I evaluated these criteria in a test condition involving a binary, two-class landscape using the Cushman method of directly applying the Boltzmann relation (s = klogW) to permuted landscape configurations and measuring the distribution of total edge length. The results show that the Cushman method directly applying the classical Boltzmann relation is fully consistent with these criteria and therefore fully thermodynamically consistent. I suggest that this method, which is a direct application of the classical and iconic formulation of Boltzmann, has advantages given its direct interpretability, theoretical elegance, and thermodynamic consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.