Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828081›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Boosting COVID-19 Image Classification Using MobileNetV3 and Aquila Optimizer Algorithm.

Mohamed Abd Elaziz, Abdelghani Dahou, Naser A Alsaleh, Ammar H Elsheikh, Amal I Saba, Mahmoud Ahmadein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Utilizing deep learning for dermal matrix quality assessment on in vivo line-field confocal optical coherence tomography images.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed Abd ElazizDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7682-6269
Abdelghani DahouMathematics and Computer Science Department, University of Ahmed DRAIA, Adrar 01000, Algeria.
Naser A AlsalehMechanical Engineering Department, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5779-0451
Ammar H ElsheikhDepartment of Production Engineering and Mechanical Design, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-4938
Amal I SabaDepartment of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt.
Mahmoud AhmadeinMechanical Engineering Department, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-6835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the world is still facing a COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) classified as a highly infectious disease due to its rapid spreading. The shortage of X-ray machines may lead to critical situations and delay the diagnosis results, increasing the number of deaths. Therefore, the exploitation of deep learning (DL) and optimization algorithms can be advantageous in early diagnosis and COVID-19 detection. In this paper, we propose a framework for COVID-19 images classification using hybridization of DL and swarm-based algorithms. The MobileNetV3 is used as a backbone feature extraction to learn and extract relevant image representations as a DL model. As a swarm-based algorithm, the Aquila Optimizer (Aqu) is used as a feature selector to reduce the dimensionality of the image representations and improve the classification accuracy using only the most essential selected features. To validate the proposed framework, two datasets with X-ray and CT COVID-19 images are used. The obtained results from the experiments show a good performance of the proposed framework in terms of classification accuracy and dimensionality reduction during the feature extraction and selection phases. The Aqu feature selection algorithm achieves accuracy better than other methods in terms of performance metrics.

Indexed as

atomic orbital searchdynamic opposite-based learningfeature selectionmetaheuristic

Identifiers

PMID34828081
PMCPMC8624090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.