Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828058›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Histopathological Features of 81 Cases of Canine Apocrine Gland Adenocarcinoma of the Anal Sac: Independent Clinical and Histopathological Risk Factors Associated with Outcome.

Hannah Wong, Stephanie Byrne, Roberta Rasotto, Randi Drees, Angela Taylor, Simon L Priestnall, Chiara Leo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Is There Anything New in Canine AGASACA?Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ultrasound Morphology of Presumed Normal Anal Sacs in Dogs and Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah WongDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9530-7106
Stephanie ByrneDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Roberta RasottoDick White Referrals, Station Farm, Six Mile Bottom, Cambridgeshire CB8 OUH, UK.
Randi DreesDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Angela TaylorDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Simon L PriestnallDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6027-1879
Chiara LeoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-2230
Royal Veterinary College · GBFarm Africa · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 096413/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma (AGASAC) is a malignant tumour with variable clinical progression. The objective of this study was to use robust multivariate models, based on models employed in human medical oncology, to establish clinical and histopathological risk factors of poor survival. Clinical data and imaging of 81 cases with AGASAC were reviewed. Tissue was available for histological review and immunohistochemistry in 49 cases. Tumour and lymph node size were determined using the response evaluation criteria in the solid tumours system (RECIST). Modelling revealed tumour size over 2 cm, lymph node size grouped in three tiers by the two thresholds 1.6 cm and 5 cm, surgical management, and radiotherapy were independent clinical variables associated with survival, irrespective of tumour stage. Tumour size over 1.3 cm and presence of distant metastasis were independent clinical variables associated with the first progression-free interval. The presence of the histopathological variables of tumour necrosis, a solid histological pattern, and vascular invasion in the primary tumour were independent risk factors of poor survival. Based upon these independent risk factors, scoring algorithms to predict survival in AGASAC patients are presented.

Indexed as

anal sac adenocarcinomaapocrine glandhistologyhypercalcemianecrosisprognosisradiotherapysurgeryvascular invasion

Identifiers

PMID34828058
PMCPMC8614406
OpenAlexW3216313744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.