Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34828021›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Training Convolutional Neural Networks to Score Pneumonia in Slaughtered Pigs.

Lorenzo Bonicelli, Abigail Rose Trachtman, Alfonso Rosamilia, Gaetano Liuzzo, Jasmine Hattab, Elena Mira Alcaraz, Ercole Del Negro, Stefano Vincenzi, Andrea Capobianco Dondona, Simone Calderara and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Welfare of calves.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Welfare of pigs on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo BonicelliAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-5602
Abigail Rose TrachtmanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Alfonso RosamiliaDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, via S. Giovanni del Cantone 23, 41121 Modena, Italy.
Gaetano LiuzzoDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, via S. Giovanni del Cantone 23, 41121 Modena, Italy.
Jasmine HattabFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3711-4450
Elena Mira AlcarazFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Ercole Del NegroAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Stefano VincenziFarm4Trades.r.l., Via IV Novembre, 66041 Atessa, Italy.
Andrea Capobianco DondonaFarm4Trades.r.l., Via IV Novembre, 66041 Atessa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5970-8383
Simone CalderaraAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Giuseppe MarruchellaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3176-3847
University of Teramo · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · IT

Funding

Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research CUP_C46C18000530001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The slaughterhouse can act as a valid checkpoint to estimate the prevalence and the economic impact of diseases in farm animals. At present, scoring lesions is a challenging and time-consuming activity, which is carried out by veterinarians serving the slaughter chain. Over recent years, artificial intelligence(AI) has gained traction in many fields of research, including livestock production. In particular, AI-based methods appear able to solve highly repetitive tasks and to consistently analyze large amounts of data, such as those collected by veterinarians during postmortem inspection in high-throughput slaughterhouses. The present study aims to develop an AI-based method capable of recognizing and quantifying enzootic pneumonia-like lesions on digital images captured from slaughtered pigs under routine abattoir conditions. Overall, the data indicate that the AI-based method proposed herein could properly identify and score enzootic pneumonia-like lesions without interfering with the slaughter chain routine. According to European legislation, the application of such a method avoids the handling of carcasses and organs, decreasing the risk of microbial contamination, and could provide further alternatives in the field of food hygiene.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksdeep learningpigpneumoniascoring methodsslaughterhouse

Identifiers

PMID34828021
PMCPMC8614402
OpenAlexW3213387114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.