Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34827947›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Prevalence of Infection with Porcine Circovirus Types 2 and 3 in the Wild Boar Population in the Campania Region (Southern Italy).

Maria Grazia Amoroso, Francesco Serra, Claudia Esposito, Nicola D'Alessio, Gianmarco Ferrara, Barbara Cioffi, Antonietta Anzalone, Ugo Pagnini, Esterina De Carlo, Giovanna Fusco and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of wild birds in the circulation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification of Aichivirus in a Pet Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Grazia AmorosoDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8663-7445
Francesco SerraDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Claudia EspositoDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Nicola D'AlessioDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Gianmarco FerraraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples "Federico II", 80137 Naples, Italy.
Barbara CioffiDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Antonietta AnzaloneDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Ugo PagniniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples "Federico II", 80137 Naples, Italy.
Esterina De CarloDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Giovanna FuscoDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Serena MontagnaroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples "Federico II", 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5569-8774
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Regione Campania Regional Plan for wildlife monitoring
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, porcine circovirus (PCV) infection has been documented as an important and emerging health concern for livestock and wildlife worldwide. The purpose of the present study was to assess the molecular prevalence of PCV-2 and PCV-3 and to clarify the epidemiological role of wild boars in the circulation of this virus in Campania, Southern Italy. For this purpose, samples from several organs were collected during the hunting season 2017-2018 from 148 wild boars in the Campania region. Quantitative real-time PCR was used for the detection and quantification of PCV-2 and PCV-3 genomes. The combined prevalence of PCV-2 and PCV-3 was 74.32% in the wild boars tested. The proportions of wild boars positive for PCV-2 or PCV-3, or coinfected, were 47.30%, 49.32%, and 22.30%, respectively. No link was detected between PCV positivity and location, but gender was a risk factor for the disease (female;

Indexed as

PCV-2PCV-3porcine circovirusprevalencewild boars

Identifiers

PMID34827947
PMCPMC8614320
OpenAlexW3214252015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.