Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34827870›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats.

Adrian Minnig, Romane Zufferey, Beat Thomann, Sibylle Zwygart, Nina Keil, Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula, Raymond Miserez, Dimitri Stucki, Patrik Zanolari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adrian MinnigClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0797-0897
Romane ZuffereyClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1190-6812
Beat ThomannVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-2231
Sibylle ZwygartCentre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Agroscope, 8356 Tänikon, Switzerland.
Nina KeilCentre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Agroscope, 8356 Tänikon, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3663-7682
Gertraud Schüpbach-RegulaVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Raymond MiserezConsulting and Health Service for Small Ruminants, 3362 Niederönz, Switzerland.
Dimitri StuckiClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Patrik ZanolariClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-2487

Funding

Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office 1.18.14TGFederal Office for Agriculture 1.18.14TG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review describes the current state of knowledge relating to scientific literature on welfare indicators for goats. Our aim was to provide an overview of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessments. We performed a literature search and extracted 96 relevant articles by title, abstract, and full-text screening. Out of these articles, similar indicators were aggregated to result in a total of 32 welfare indicators, some of which were covered in multiple articles, others in only a single one. We discuss a set of three established assessment protocols containing these indicators, as well as all individual indicators which were covered in more than one article. As single indicators, we identified lameness, body condition score (BCS), qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA), and human-animal relationship (HAR) tests with substantial evidence for sufficient validity to assess welfare in goats. A multitude of indicators (e.g., hair coat condition) was studied less intensively but was successfully used for welfare assessments. For some indicators (e.g., oblivion, lying behaviour), we highlight the need for future research to further validate them or to optimise their use in on-farm welfare assessments. Moreover, further investigations need to include kids, bucks, and meat and fibre goats, as well as extensively kept goats as the literature predominantly focuses on dairy goats in intensive production systems.

Indexed as

animal-basedgoaton-farmsmall ruminantwelfare assessmentwelfare indicators

Identifiers

PMID34827870
PMCPMC8614408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.